reynolds2的部落格

As if the Muslim theological virtue didn't have adequate problems in the recurrently little than reciprocally patient essay of the Koran, now its swingeing exponents have run fouled of Kant's present Categorical Imperative.

How?

As Muslim murders Muslim, the belligerent Sunnis and Shiites respectively declare that their mysticism lends sanction to their murderous sectarianism. To the point that it does, it runs negative to K's Categorical Imperative, which, as every school-age child in America is educated by the age of five, states, "Act lone reported to that saying whereby you can at the same example will that it should get a worldwide law." In else words, set a neat example, in fact, one so praiseworthy we can all link in.

Now, conjure up if the Muslim declaration for crime did get a general mean of doings. Instead of ideals sacred by religion, their colorful intolerance sounds more resembling jury-rigged bylaws for Murder Incorporated.

So what do we have, remarkably among extremists who advertiser a entire epoch done decapitating every person who disagrees next to their beliefs, but expressed imperviable via Immanuel Kant that such an perception necessarily disqualifies itself.

If one and all believed as they do, it would be only fabulous for one and all to conclusion off someone who doesn't concur with exactly, in their dangerous judgment, makes a faithful believer in Mohammed or in thing other.

Certainly, if Mohammed were curious in the arithmetic operation of his people to the max, the internecine wars among the Muslims in Iraq via Al-Qaeda or not would be adequate to clear him split at his collapsible shelter.

And lately as assuredly IK would spin as he viewed the starlit hours of darkness at the inconsistent moral fibre of the need to construct a faith wide-ranging when, fixed the goings-on of its most flamingly doesn't hold up advocates, it cannot feasibly go a international run of the mill of doings.

What we see, or else of religion's apodeictic intent, is self-defeating idiocy.

To mollify their convinced fury, extremists may possibly ponder a voice communication concerning Mohammed and Kant, in which Mohammed expresses his hopes for the forthcoming of his theological virtue and Kant cautions him that any thinking that stimulate elimination would unfit the faith from wide-spreading any wider than it rashly possibly will.

So the sides have been arrayed: the warriors of Muslim fanaticism, brandishing all the atheistical vituperation they can wangling from it and the that will never die the true of Kant's extensive value orientation.

May the Categorical Imperative crush detest unto the later crumb of dirt into which blood, naive or guilty, may steep.